TL;DR
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a November 11 parliamentary hearing to raise objections to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright law revision. The draft could require payments for news links and set rules for AI training, disclosures and creator rights, but its current text is not publicly confirmed and it has not become law.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in objecting to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on November 11, as lawmakers consider rules that could require platforms to pay for displaying news and regulate how copyrighted work is used to train AI. The bill is still being deliberated, and the full version discussed at the hearing has not been made publicly available.
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Indonesia’s parliament is considering revisions to Law No. 28 of 2014, the country’s copyright law. The proposal was approved as a parliamentary initiative on March 12, 2026, and is being discussed by the parliament’s Legislation Body, known as Baleg, together with the government. According to Kompas, the November 11 hearing included Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia.
The draft’s reported provisions cover both news distribution and AI. A version reported by Reuters in July would require platforms to compensate publishers when they aggregate, republish or show previews of news, and would address use of copyrighted work for AI training. It also proposed rules on AI disclosures, AI-assisted works and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. That July version is not final, and reports about it should not be treated as a definitive account of the text now under discussion.
At the hearing, Google said the proposal could require payment for indexing, aggregation, curation and displaying news snippets, according to Suara. Google also objected to mandatory collective licensing and licensing requirements for AI training data, and called for platforms to retain safe-harbor protections. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing an article and said payment obligations could reduce traffic and revenue for publishers. TikTok said AI disclosure requirements should not cover cases where AI is used only as an assistive tool, and also supported retaining safe-harbor protections.
A Dispute Over News and AI Rights
The proposal could shape how Indonesian publishers are paid when platforms surface their reporting, while also setting conditions for developers that train AI systems on copyrighted material. Its scope matters to creators and media businesses because the reported provisions reach beyond news to areas such as photography, film, video games and software.
The competing arguments reflect different concerns about the digital news economy. The Press Council told lawmakers that platforms account for 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by as much as 70 percent, according to reporting cited in the source material. Those figures are the council’s claims; the information provided does not establish their methodology or comparison periods. Platforms, meanwhile, say payment duties for links could affect news discovery and publishers’ referral traffic.
For AI developers, the unresolved choices include whether training on copyrighted works would be allowed under fair use, require licenses, or be subject to other conditions. Rules on style imitation and disclosure could also affect how AI-assisted content is created and labeled. The hearing shows these issues are under debate; it does not establish what obligations the final law will impose.
Products Worth Considering
Samsung 32 Odyssey G5 (G51F) QHD 180Hz Gaming Monitor
LG UltraGear 34G600A-B 34-Inch Curved WQHD Gaming Monitor, 160Hz
Samsung Odyssey G9 QD-OLED 49 Dual QHD Curved Gaming Monitor
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From 2014 Law to AI Revision
The proposal would revise Indonesia’s existing copyright statute, which dates to 2014. Since 2024, Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 has also required digital platforms to support quality journalism. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that compliance with that regulation has been low and that it has not worked as intended, according to Aktual.
Reuters reported on a July draft that would recognize AI-related questions explicitly in the copyright law. Law ministry official Hermansyah Siregar confirmed that draft’s authenticity to Reuters, while stressing that it was not final. The reported text included possible limits on AI imitation of distinctive creator styles, disclosure requirements and conditions for protecting AI-assisted work. It did not specify how much human involvement would be needed for a work to qualify.
At the November hearing, Google referred to Articles 29 and 30 of the version before lawmakers, according to Suara. The complete current text was not available to the source, and reporting refers to different versions. The article numbers and descriptions of particular provisions therefore remain provisional.
“A levy on links would leave Google “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
The full text discussed on November 11 was not available to the source material, and the draft has changed since the version Reuters described in July. Accounts of specific clauses, including article numbers and the exact scope of payment duties, may therefore refer to different iterations.
It is also unclear what final language lawmakers will adopt on AI training, fair use, licensing, disclosures, style imitation, safe-harbor protections or sanctions. No vote date was announced in the supplied material, and the proposal remains under deliberation. Statements by the companies and the Press Council are positions presented in the debate, not findings established by the hearing.
Lawmakers Continue Deliberations
Baleg and the government are expected to continue deliberating the proposed revision. The next key developments will be publication or confirmation of the text under discussion, any changes made after stakeholder input, and the scheduling of a parliamentary vote. The supplied reporting does not give a date for that vote.
Until lawmakers approve a final version and it completes the required legislative process, the reported provisions remain proposals. Further reporting will be needed to establish the final obligations for platforms, publishers, creators and AI developers.
Key Questions
What did Meta and TikTok do?
They joined Google in raising objections at an Indonesian parliamentary hearing on November 11 about provisions in a proposed copyright law revision.
Would the bill require payment for news links?
A draft reported earlier would require compensation for certain forms of news aggregation, republication and link previews. Google said the version discussed at the hearing could require payment for indexing and displaying news snippets. The current full text was unavailable, so the final scope is not confirmed.
What AI issues does the proposal address?
Reported drafts address copyright use in AI training, disclosure of AI use, the status of AI-assisted works and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. The provisions may change, and the final requirements are not yet known.
Has Indonesia passed the revised copyright law?
No. The proposal is still under deliberation by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. No vote date was announced in the supplied reporting.
Source: Thorsten Meyer AI
